EN ISO 105 vs AATCC 61: Key Differences in Textile Color Fastness Testing

Last Updated Mar 25, 2025

EN ISO 105 focuses on evaluating colorfastness of textiles to various agents such as washing, rubbing, and light, ensuring durability and quality in fabric appearance. AATCC 61 simulates accelerated laundering to assess colorfastness and fabric performance under repetitive wash conditions, providing a rapid testing method to predict your textile's behavior in real-life use.

Table of Comparison

Aspect EN ISO 105 AATCC 61
Standard Type European and International Textile Color Fastness Test American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists Colorfastness Test
Test Focus Color fastness to washing, light, rubbing, perspiration, and water Color fastness to accelerated laundering
Test Method Multiple parts covering different fastness aspects (e.g., EN ISO 105-C06 for washing) Accelerated laundering using a washing machine with standard ballast fabrics
Sample Quantity Typically single specimen or few swatches per test Multiple swatches (usually 3) exposed simultaneously
Equipment Lab washing machines, lightfastness testers, rubbing apparatus Standard launderometer or home-type washing machine
Test Duration Varies by part; washing cycles usually 30-60 minutes 5 accelerated home laundering cycles, simulating multiple washes
Purpose Comprehensive assessment of textile color fastness in various conditions Evaluate colorfastness under simulated domestic laundering
Geographical Use Widely used in Europe and internationally Primarily used in the USA

Introduction to EN ISO 105 and AATCC 61

EN ISO 105 is a comprehensive international standard that specifies test methods for evaluating color fastness of textiles, essential for ensuring fabric durability and quality in various applications. AATCC 61 is a widely recognized American test method that simulates accelerated laundering to assess colorfastness, providing critical data on fabric performance under repeated washing conditions. Both standards play a crucial role in textile testing by offering reliable procedures to measure the resistance of dyed and printed fabrics to color change and staining.

Overview of Colorfastness Testing Standards

EN ISO 105 and AATCC 61 are prominent colorfastness testing standards used in the textile industry to evaluate the resistance of fabrics to color change and staining during laundering. EN ISO 105 specifically covers a range of tests for colorfastness to domestic and commercial laundering, ensuring compliance with European performance criteria, while AATCC 61 simulates accelerated laundering effects, providing rapid assessment according to American testing protocols. Both standards utilize specific test conditions and evaluation methods to quantify color durability, supporting quality control and consumer safety in textile production.

Key Differences Between EN ISO 105 and AATCC 61

EN ISO 105 and AATCC 61 are standardized tests used to evaluate colorfastness and colorfastness to laundering, respectively. EN ISO 105 focuses on assessing colorfastness to various conditions such as washing, light, rubbing, and perspiration, while AATCC 61 specifically simulates accelerated laundering conditions to test colorfastness during washing. The key difference lies in EN ISO 105 encompassing a broader range of colorfastness properties, whereas AATCC 61 concentrates primarily on assessing the durability of color through repeated washing cycles.

Test Methods and Procedures

EN ISO 105 and AATCC 61 are standardized test methods used for assessing colorfastness to laundering in textiles, with EN ISO 105 focusing on specific colorfastness grades and detailed washing procedures applicable primarily in Europe. AATCC 61 simulates accelerated laundering using standardized test conditions to replicate multiple home or commercial washes within a shorter time frame, providing rapid insights into fabric durability. Your choice between these methods depends on regional compliance requirements and the precision needed for textile durability evaluation.

Equipment and Materials Required

EN ISO 105 requires standardized equipment such as the crockmeter for assessing colorfastness to rubbing, alongside specified dyes and fabrics defined by the ISO standards. AATCC 61 testing mandates the use of a specific laundering apparatus, typically the Tumble Washer and the stainless steel ball method, incorporating precise detergent formulations for accelerated laundering simulations. Both standards emphasize calibrated instruments and controlled environmental conditions to ensure reproducibility in colorfastness evaluations.

Performance Criteria and Evaluation

EN ISO 105 and AATCC 61 are both standardized methods for assessing colorfastness and durability of textiles, but they differ significantly in performance criteria and evaluation processes. EN ISO 105 focuses on colorfastness to various factors such as washing, light, and rubbing, using a graded scale (usually 1-5) to evaluate color change or staining severity. AATCC 61 specifically simulates accelerated laundering to assess colorfastness and physical durability by subjecting textiles to multiple cycle washes, with evaluation based on color change, staining, and fabric integrity compared to established reference standards.

Applicability to Different Textiles

EN ISO 105 standards primarily target colorfastness testing across a diverse range of textile materials, including natural fibers, synthetics, and blends, ensuring consistent evaluation of fabric durability under various conditions. AATCC 61 specifically addresses colorfastness to laundering for textiles commonly found in the American market, with protocols adaptable to cotton, polyester, and mixed-fiber fabrics. While EN ISO 105 offers a broader scope for global textile applications, AATCC 61 provides detailed guidance tailored to laundry-related colorfastness challenges in consumer textiles.

International Acceptance and Usage

EN ISO 105 and AATCC 61 are both widely recognized textile testing standards, with EN ISO 105 being more prevalent in European and international markets for colorfastness evaluation, while AATCC 61 is primarily used in the United States for accelerated laundering tests. Your choice between these standards depends on the target market's regulatory requirements and acceptance, as EN ISO 105 enjoys broader international recognition, and AATCC 61 is favored by North American manufacturers. Understanding their differences ensures compliance with global textile quality benchmarks, enhancing product acceptance worldwide.

Impact on Textile Quality Control

EN ISO 105 and AATCC 61 serve distinct roles in textile quality control, with EN ISO 105 providing comprehensive colorfastness test methods essential for evaluating fabric durability under various conditions. AATCC 61 specifically measures colorfastness to accelerated laundering, simulating multiple home wash cycles to predict long-term color retention. Your quality control processes benefit from integrating both standards to ensure textile products meet rigorous performance and consumer expectations.

Choosing the Right Standard for Your Needs

Selecting between EN ISO 105 and AATCC 61 depends on your specific textile testing requirements, as EN ISO 105 focuses on color fastness to various factors such as light, washing, and rubbing, while AATCC 61 simulates accelerated laundering to evaluate colorfastness under repeated wash conditions. Your choice should consider the geographic market and industry standards relevant to your product, with EN ISO 105 widely recognized in Europe and AATCC 61 favored in North America for more rigorous wash durability testing. Understanding the testing methods and performance criteria ensures accurate assessment of colorfastness, protecting your textile products from premature fading and quality loss.

EN ISO 105 vs AATCC 61 Infographic

EN ISO 105 vs AATCC 61: Key Differences in Textile Color Fastness Testing


About the author.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about EN ISO 105 vs AATCC 61 are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet