Nylon vs. Acetal: Comprehensive Comparison of Plastic Properties, Applications, and Performance

Last Updated Mar 25, 2025

Nylon offers excellent abrasion resistance and flexibility, making it ideal for applications requiring durability under stress, while Acetal provides superior stiffness, low friction, and dimensional stability, perfect for precision parts and smooth operation. Your choice depends on whether you prioritize toughness and impact resistance (Nylon) or rigidity and minimal wear (Acetal).

Table of Comparison

Property Nylon Acetal (POM)
Material Type Polyamide Polyoxymethylene (Acetal)
Density 1.15 g/cm3 1.41 g/cm3
Tensile Strength 75 - 90 MPa 60 - 70 MPa
Water Absorption 2-3% (high) < 0.2% (low)
Coefficient of Friction Higher (0.2 - 0.4) Lower (0.15 - 0.25)
Chemical Resistance Good (alkalis, fuels) Excellent (solvents, fuels)
Wear Resistance Good Excellent
Operating Temperature -40 to 120 degC -40 to 105 degC
Applications Gears, bearings, textiles, automotive Precision parts, gears, bearings, electrical
Cost Moderate Higher

Introduction to Nylon and Acetal

Nylon and Acetal are engineering thermoplastics known for their strength, durability, and resistance to wear and chemicals. Nylon offers excellent flexibility and impact resistance, making it ideal for applications like gears, bearings, and textiles, while Acetal provides superior stiffness and low friction, commonly used in precision parts and automotive components. Your choice between Nylon and Acetal depends on specific mechanical requirements and environmental factors in your project.

Overview of Material Properties

Nylon exhibits high tensile strength, excellent abrasion resistance, and good chemical stability, making it ideal for wear-intensive applications. Acetal offers superior stiffness, low friction, and excellent dimensional stability under varying temperatures, preferred for precision mechanical components. Both materials provide strong mechanical performance, but Nylon excels in impact resistance while Acetal delivers better creep resistance and moisture resistance.

Mechanical Strength Comparison

Nylon exhibits superior tensile strength and flexibility, making it ideal for applications requiring impact resistance and durability under dynamic loads. Acetal offers high stiffness, excellent dimensional stability, and lower friction, which benefits precision parts subjected to repetitive motion. Your choice depends on whether you prioritize toughness and elasticity with Nylon or rigidity and wear resistance with Acetal.

Wear and Friction Performance

Nylon exhibits excellent wear resistance and low friction properties, making it ideal for applications involving continuous sliding and heavy loads. Acetal offers superior dimensional stability with consistent low friction coefficients, ensuring minimal wear in precision parts such as gears and bearings. Both materials provide durable performance, but nylon's natural lubricity gives it an edge in dynamic, high-wear environments.

Chemical Resistance Differences

Nylon exhibits strong resistance to oils, fuels, and some chemicals but is prone to degradation when exposed to strong acids and bases, absorbing moisture that can affect its mechanical properties. Acetal, also known as polyoxymethylene (POM), offers superior chemical resistance to solvents, fuels, and dilute acids, while maintaining low moisture absorption and excellent dimensional stability. This makes acetal more suitable than nylon for applications requiring sustained exposure to harsh chemicals and damp environments.

Moisture Absorption and Stability

Nylon exhibits higher moisture absorption, which can lead to dimensional changes and reduced stability in humid environments. Acetal maintains superior dimensional stability due to its low moisture absorption, making it ideal for applications requiring consistent mechanical properties. Your choice between nylon and acetal should consider the environmental conditions and the need for moisture resistance.

Temperature Tolerance and Performance

Nylon exhibits a temperature tolerance typically ranging from -40degC to 120degC, making it suitable for moderate heat applications, while Acetal withstands higher continuous operating temperatures up to 105degC and short-term exposures near 130degC. Acetal offers superior dimensional stability and mechanical performance under thermal stress, maintaining strength and rigidity where Nylon may soften or absorb moisture, affecting its properties. In high-temperature environments demanding precision and wear resistance, Acetal often outperforms Nylon due to its lower moisture absorption and better thermal endurance.

Typical Applications for Nylon vs Acetal

Nylon is commonly used in automotive parts, electrical components, and consumer goods due to its excellent wear resistance and flexibility, making it ideal for gears, bushings, and connectors. Acetal, known for its high stiffness, low friction, and dimensional stability, is frequently applied in precision mechanical parts, such as bearings, valve components, and conveyor system parts. Understanding these typical applications helps you select the right material based on performance requirements and environmental conditions.

Cost Analysis and Availability

Nylon generally offers a more cost-effective solution compared to Acetal, making it a preferred choice for budget-sensitive applications without compromising durability. Acetal tends to be pricier due to its superior dimensional stability and chemical resistance, but its consistent availability across industrial suppliers ensures fewer delays in procurement. Your choice should balance Nylon's affordability and widespread availability against Acetal's higher cost and specialized properties.

Choosing the Right Material: Key Considerations

Selecting between nylon and acetal hinges on factors like mechanical strength, moisture absorption, and chemical resistance. Nylon offers superior toughness and abrasion resistance, making it ideal for dynamic applications but absorbs moisture, which can affect dimensional stability. Acetal provides excellent stiffness, low friction, and minimal moisture uptake, preferred for precision parts requiring stable performance in humid environments.

Nylon vs Acetal Infographic

Nylon vs. Acetal: Comprehensive Comparison of Plastic Properties, Applications, and Performance


About the author.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about Nylon vs Acetal are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet