Silicone vs. Fluoroelastomer in Rubber: Key Differences, Applications, and Performance

Last Updated Feb 15, 2025

Silicone offers excellent flexibility and heat resistance, making it ideal for applications requiring durability under high temperatures and repeated compression. Fluoroelastomer excels in chemical resistance and fuel exposure, ensuring your seals and gaskets withstand aggressive environments without degrading.

Table of Comparison

Property Silicone Fluoroelastomer (FKM)
Temperature Range -60degC to 230degC -20degC to 200degC
Chemical Resistance Good against ozone, UV, and oxidants Excellent against fuels, oils, acids, and solvents
Mechanical Strength Moderate tensile strength and wear resistance High tensile strength and abrasion resistance
Flexibility Excellent flexibility at low temperatures Good flexibility but less than silicone
Cost Lower cost Higher cost
Applications Medical devices, food processing, electrical insulation Automotive seals, fuel systems, chemical processing

Introduction to Silicone and Fluoroelastomer

Silicone and fluoroelastomer are two prominent types of elastomers known for their unique chemical and physical properties. Silicone is widely valued for its excellent thermal stability, flexibility, and resistance to weathering, making it ideal for applications in medical devices, automotive parts, and consumer goods. Fluoroelastomer, characterized by exceptional chemical resistance and durability in harsh environments, is commonly used in aerospace, chemical processing, and fuel system components.

Chemical Composition and Structure

Silicone is a synthetic polymer composed of repeating units of silicon-oxygen chains with organic side groups, providing high flexibility and thermal stability. Fluoroelastomers consist of carbon-fluorine bonds in their polymer backbone, delivering exceptional chemical resistance and durability against solvents and fuels. Your choice between these materials should consider the specific chemical exposure and temperature requirements of your application.

Key Physical Properties Comparison

Silicone and fluoroelastomer differ significantly in key physical properties such as temperature resistance, chemical stability, and elasticity. Silicone excels in flexibility and can withstand extreme temperatures ranging from -60degC to 230degC, making it ideal for applications requiring durable insulation and cushioning. Fluoroelastomer offers superior chemical resistance and durability in harsh environments, withstanding temperatures up to 200degC and exposure to aggressive chemicals, which makes it suitable for seals and gaskets in automotive or aerospace industries.

Temperature Resistance Performance

Silicone exhibits excellent temperature resistance, maintaining stability in a wide range from -60degC to 230degC, making it ideal for applications requiring flexibility in extreme heat or cold. Fluoroelastomer outperforms silicone in high-temperature environments, withstanding continuous exposure up to 260degC and offering superior chemical resistance under harsh conditions. Your choice between silicone and fluoroelastomer hinges on the specific temperature resistance performance needed for optimal durability and reliability.

Chemical and Environmental Resistance

Silicone offers excellent chemical inertness and maintains stability across a wide temperature range, making it resistant to water, ozone, and many solvents but vulnerable to hydrocarbons and acids. Fluoroelastomers, known for superior chemical resistance, withstand aggressive fuels, oils, and solvents while exhibiting exceptional resistance to high temperatures and environmental degradation. Your choice between these materials should consider fluoroelastomer for demanding chemical exposure and silicone for moderate, broader temperature applications.

Durability and Longevity

Silicone offers excellent temperature resistance but tends to degrade faster under harsh chemical exposure, limiting its durability in extreme environments. Fluoroelastomers provide superior chemical resistance and maintain their mechanical properties over a wider range of temperatures, resulting in greater longevity for seals and gaskets. Choosing Fluoroelastomer ensures your components withstand aggressive fluids and high temperatures longer, enhancing overall equipment durability.

Common Industrial Applications

Silicone and fluoroelastomer are essential materials in industrial applications due to their distinct properties. Silicone excels in electrical insulation, food processing seals, and medical devices because of its biocompatibility and temperature resistance. Fluoroelastomer outperforms in chemical processing, automotive fuel systems, and aerospace sealing solutions, thanks to its exceptional chemical resistance and durability under extreme conditions.

Cost and Availability

Silicone offers a more budget-friendly option compared to fluoroelastomer, making it widely accessible for various industrial applications. Fluoroelastomer tends to be more expensive due to its superior chemical resistance and high-performance characteristics, limiting its availability to specialized markets. Choosing between the two depends on your specific requirements for cost efficiency and material durability.

Pros and Cons of Silicone vs Fluoroelastomer

Silicone offers excellent thermal stability, flexibility, and biocompatibility, making it ideal for medical and food-grade applications, but it has lower chemical resistance and tensile strength compared to fluoroelastomers. Fluoroelastomers provide superior resistance to fuels, oils, and harsh chemicals, as well as excellent sealing performance at high temperatures, although they tend to be less flexible and more expensive than silicone. Choosing between the two depends on specific application requirements such as temperature range, chemical exposure, and mechanical stress.

Choosing the Right Material for Your Application

Silicone offers excellent flexibility and temperature resistance from -60degC to 230degC, making it ideal for applications requiring biocompatibility and weathering durability. Fluoroelastomer excels in chemical and fuel resistance with a temperature range of -26degC to 205degC, suited for harsh environments like automotive and aerospace seals. Selecting the right material depends on your application's exposure to chemicals, temperature extremes, and mechanical stress.

Silicone vs Fluoroelastomer Infographic

Silicone vs. Fluoroelastomer in Rubber: Key Differences, Applications, and Performance


About the author.

Disclaimer.
The information provided in this document is for general informational purposes only and is not guaranteed to be complete. While we strive to ensure the accuracy of the content, we cannot guarantee that the details mentioned are up-to-date or applicable to all scenarios. Topics about Silicone vs Fluoroelastomer are subject to change from time to time.

Comments

No comment yet